Finance and operational rigour
Experience in an international consulting firm, within a Financial Services business unit.
An independent adviser at your side. Built for the decision, not for the report.
You do not work with a team that changes halfway through the engagement. You work with the person who built the analysis, and who stays reachable until you decide.
“In a context where international relations are tightening for our companies, what matters is not to expand abroad further, but to do it better. Our work is to make projection possible in a world that seems to rule it out.”
Nathan Chesnais, founder of NSC Strategy
Experience in an international consulting firm, within a Financial Services business unit.
IT regulatory project manager, coordinating several international entities of a French systemically important bank.
Master's in International Trade and Strategy, University of Bordeaux. Dissertation on Sino-American trade tensions.
Raw data says nothing. We explain what it means for your company.
You test our conclusions against your knowledge of the ground, and we correct them.
We stay available through the period when the decision is really being made.
We state a verdict we stand behind, GO or NO-GO, and we defend it in front of you.
Independence
Speed
Precision
The analysis is built with you, not beside you. Your objections correct the model, your knowledge of the ground corrects the assumptions, and the final verdict is defended face to face.
01
Macroeconomic, sector and regulatory data gathered market by market, on a comparable basis.
02
Income statement, cash flow, net present value and internal rate of return for each market.
03
Key assumptions are varied to find the threshold at which the scenario turns.
04
A reasoned verdict, a ranking of markets and a spoken debrief with your leadership.
The NSC matrix
| Criterion | Market A | Market B | Market C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Macro and geopolitical context | Favourable | Caution | Unfavourable |
| Sector momentum | Favourable | Favourable | Caution |
| Operational feasibility | Caution | Favourable | Caution |
| Financial viability | Favourable | Caution | Unfavourable |
| Resilience to shocks | Caution | Favourable | Unfavourable |
0
markets analysed in parallel
0
sub-sectors covered
4-0
weeks to a verdict
0
country data points updated automatically
“Do we go or not?”
“How do I go about it?”
“At your own pace”
Three situations that come up in early conversations, and what we answer.
“I have a hunch about a market, but nothing to put numbers on it.”
Put numbers on an idea
We give your hypothesis a numerical shape: reachable volumes, expected margin, capital to tie up. You decide on orders of magnitude, no longer on an impression.
“I think I know this market. I would like someone to contradict me.”
Challenge your instincts
We test your reading against comparable data and an outside view that owes you nothing. If it is right, you will know it with figures behind it.
“I will not tie up my teams for six months on a hypothesis.”
Test without committing
Four to five weeks, one point of contact, a reasoned verdict on several markets. Your teams stay on their own work throughout.
Next step
A 30-minute conversation is enough to judge whether our approach fits your situation.
Request received
Nathan Chesnais reads it himself and replies to you personally, at the address you provided.